MURICO.com Forum

Re: Dewey, I like that----
In Response To: Hogs by Judy Crawford ()

"we will know more about what we don't know" I always make lists of what We Know and What We Don't Know. It always seems to me that the What We know category is irrelevant because What We Don't Know always brings the SURPRISES that takes us to the woodshed. Yet, everybody(myself included) keep repeating and talking up What We Know. If we focused on What We Don't Know and the potential results from those potential answers we would all be more cautious, better off, and not on the receiving end of those harmful SURPRISES. The majority of the time, the answers to What We Don't Know seems to do great damage to the overloaded trains full of What We Know traders.

It's a vicious cycle, "What We Don't Know" surprises those trading "What We Know". With a little time and validation "What We Don't Know" all of a sudden becomes "What We Know". Round and round we go. It seems to me when "What We Know" becomes common acceptance, there's danger of a major direction shift unfolding and lines at the woodshed get bigger.

Messages In This Thread

Hogs by Judy Crawford
Re: Dewey, I like that----
We all know that the price - - -